I guess I can be a pretty bad person. The first thing that came to mind when I read this article about Hundreds of Shellfish Species Discovered was, "MMMmmm, I wonder how they'd all taste steamed with clarified butter on the side?" I suppose I should put my taste buds aside and take joy in a scientific discovery, but it's hard because I love seafood.
I grew up eating seafood. I have fond memories as a small boy going into DC with my dad to the Maine Avenue Fish Market to get a bushel of crabs for a backyard crab feast. I loved looking at all the different fish, shrimp, clams, mussels, crabs, oysters, etc. I love eating them even more. Maybe with this new discovery, I can make my way into some sort of secret club ala The Freshman.
I was listening to Tony Rice's Bluegrass Guitar Collection the other day walking to work. Bluegrass and skyscrapers were a pairing that made me smile.
ENERGY STAR qualified CFLs:
- Use at least 2/3 less energy than standard incandescent bulbs to provide the same amount of light, and last up to 10 times longer.
- Save $30 or more in energy costs over each bulb’s lifetime
- Generate 70 percent less heat, so they’re safer to operate and can cut energy costs associated with home cooling.
- In addition to other quality requirements, must turn on instantly, produce no sound, and fall within a warm color range or be otherwise labeled as providing cooler color tones.
- Are available in different sizes and shapes to fit in almost any fixture, for indoors and outdoors.
I'm really skeptical when people play with numbers, but here's an interesting savings calculator showing the money you can save by using compact flourescent light bulbs. Saving money, saving the earth, and you get the same amount of light as normal light bulbs? Sounds like a no-brainer. Even though it seems that the savings will be obvious, it still might be hard to plop down a fiver for something I normally pay $0.75 for.
Marbury comes around and says, ""Kids shouldn't have to feel the pressure to spend so much to feel good about the way they look. I'm blessed to be in a position to do something about it, to help change the world." He's come out with a line of inexpensive shoes and clothes available exclusively available at Steve and Barry's. The shoes cost $15, and I don't think that any of the clothes cost more than $10. I got hooked up with a $6 hat, a $6 t-shirt, and a $10 pair of tearaway basketball pants along with my $15 Starbury Ones. I picked up the clothes mainly cause I wanted to support the business, but it's a bonus that it's cool looking and decent quality. I'll definitely be going back for more when it warms up enough to where I can be out on the blacktop.
I'm hoping that the Starbury collection does well and that it's adopted by the kids in my church and after-school program. Moreso, I'm hoping that more famous athletes and other celebrities follow in Marbury's tracks with similar socially-minded ventures.
For Christmas, my brother gave me one of the new 5-bladed Gillette Fusion razors. He bought one, but then found himself with an extra that Gillette had sent him for free. He gave the extra to me. He had told me that he truly felt that there was a difference in the shave the razor gave. I thanked him, and figured I'd get around to trying it when I needed to change the head on my Gillette Mach 3. I wasn't in a hurry, as I had tried the Schick Quattro a few years ago when I was sent one for free and wasn't all that impressed. My brother also gave me a can of the new Fusion shaving cream, which he was pretty sure made a difference and was a notch above other shaving creams. I'm not sure about that, but I do like the scent.
So I'm in the shower this morning getting ready to shave with the new fusion. [If you don't shave in the shower, stop reading this right now, and go to Bed, Bath, and Beyond, and pick up a fog-free shower mirror for $10. The steam will soften your skin and whiskers and it will make shaving 10 times easier and you'll be 10 times less likely to nick yourself.] I'm looking at the Fusion with some skepticism and amusement. I don't know what's up with the look of this razor. Razors don't need a "look." I mean come on... you had some serious nerds that must have designed this. I can only imagine the internal fight between the design team and the marketing department that kept them from actually giving the razor the handle of a lightsaber.
While I'm totally cool with lightsabers (who isn't), I don't need my razor to make me think of Star Wars... that happens naturally enough on its own.So anyway, I'm in the shower laughing at the design of the razor, and I'm already a little miffed at Gillette, because I feel like my intelligence is a bit insulted. What does fusion have to do with shaving? I know a TON about fusion, specifically Cold Fusion- check it. They don't tell ME about fusion... I know.
Let's wrap this up. I start shaving with the Fusion, and my first thought is that the blades aren't cutting the whiskers. I realize that I must have the razor at the wrong angle. It's too effortless and smooth to be actually working. I kept at it for a minute wondering if it was actually that good. After a few swipes on the side of my face, I put my hand up to check the shave, and DANG! My face was smooth. I finished my shave, and honestly stood there for a minute suprised. That was a good shave. I didn't think that it would be any different from my Mach 3, and I definitely didn't think it would be noticably different. I really didn't think that there could be a razor that could be noticably better than what's already on the market. The Fusion is the real deal. Now the problem is that the Mach 3 doesn't stink by any means. With the price difference of the blades for the Fusion and the Mach 3 (which are already expensive), I'm not sure if I'm going to switch, but maybe after a few more weeks of shaving I won't want to go back.
I had previously read The Hobbit, and had really enjoyed it. I figured that as the prequel to the LOTR, the books to follow would be similar. If you don't know, they aren't. The Hobbit is akin to a young person's book, and the LOTR trilogy is definitely an adult read... at least in my opinion. It is not necessarily adult in content, but adult in terms of the reading level it is written at (which I think must be just a notch above mine).
Because I not only enjoy, but I'm okay admitting that I enjoy some fantasy genre in my diet, I scarcely admitted to anyone that I didn't LOVE reading the LOTR trilogy. Not only did I not love reading it, I was finding myself trudging through the books, not unlike how I would trudge through some books I used to have to read for high school English class. My brain has probably jellified some over the years through a steady diet of magazines and novels most people would not classify as literature. You see, I don't read David Sedaris, and I'm actually frightened of the thought of reading American Pastoral based on the intellect of people I know who claim that as a favorite book.
Maybe it's not that my brain isn't a race car, but that I'm impatient. I found in reading the LOTR, that Tolkien would be working towards a great battle, only to spend the next ten pages detailing the mythology of the land that the battle was to take place. "Give me the sword fighting I crave!" I would shout in my head to J.R.R. ( like to think that I'd be on a first name basis if I knew him).... and that's how my reading of the novels would go. I don't doubt that I probably skimmed over some of the pages to more quickly get to pages of Legolas unleashing a hail of arrows onto some evil orc hordes. Sweet! Good triumphing over evil rocks!
So, in the interest of not writing a trilogy length post, let me be quick. I finished the books, and the movies came out. I loved the movies, and they quickly rose to the tippity-tops of my favorite movies, along with Star Wars and The Matrix. I don't have the writing skillz to explain how I felt watching The Return of the King, but I had just a myriad of strong emotions during that movie, and I know that rarely do I exhibit any real emotions during my movie watching. I walked out of the movie theater astounded, knowing I just watched a truly great film.
I've watched the LOTR trilogy many times, and I realized it was time to read the books again. Let me say that I'm amazed at how much I love the books. This time reading through the books, I can't get enough of the details. Even though an epic battle may be looming in the pages, I'd be willing to read two more trilogies of the mythology behind the story before I actually get to read about the battle.
I think the great thing is how J.R.R. creates a world that I care about. The example I want to share is the city of Osgiliath. In the movies, this ruined city was the setting of a few scenes, largely in The Return of the King. If you only watch the movie, you might merely think of it as a cool setting, and a neat place for humans to fight some orcs. A ancient city in ruins is fairly cliche for stories dealing with adventure. In reading the books however (and you may wish to check out the Wikipedia article about Osgiliath I linked at the beginning of the paragraph), you find out some of the history of Osgiliath. You realize that it was once a city where people lived, and battles were fought, and evil took over, and people were pushed out of. More simply put, you actually care about the city. It becomes like a real place, rather than just a cool location for a fight scene.
I'm realizing that I love the LOTR movies, because they brought the story to life in my eyes and ears. I'm finding that I love the LOTR books because they are bringing the story to life in my heart. As lame as that sounds, I really can't think of a better way to describe it. It seems silly, but J.R.R.'s writing is really helping the story come to life for me, and I'm thoroughly enjoying it.
That's great. I do much the same thing almost every day. read more
on MP3 Player + Bluegrass + NYC = Amused Matt